DEL Rule Changes

Washington State can protect children without eliminating due process rights of childcare Providers.

The newly created Department of Early Learning (DEL) is providing the promise of change from the status quo of the previous agency. DEL replaces the former Division of Child Care and Early Learning (DCCEL), however, with few exceptions, DCCEL staff remains part of DEL. The question remains if the former employees of DCCEL will embrace a partnership with licensed childcare Providers or resist the changes promised by DEL director Jone Bosworth.

Prior to Ms. Bosworth being selected as the director of the DEL, Emergency Rules were created. These Emergency Rules include Revised Code Of Washington (RCW) and Washington Administrative Codes (WAC). Carla Gira, identified as the interim Rules Coordinator, a former DCCEL employee with a different title, submitted these Emergency Rules. It is clearly evident that these rules give additional authority to department staff and undermine due process of the childcare Provider. These rules are highly prejudicial to the childcare community and therefore impact the working families who have children enrolled in Washington State licensed childcares. There was no Provider representation when these Emergency Rules were created.

Licensed childcare Providers are now governed under the Department of Early Learning's RCW 43.215. Licensed childcare Providers had been governed under DSHS's RCW 74.15. New RCWs were created as a result of the Agency change yet an important statute found under RCW 74.15 was omitted from RCW 43.215.

The change in Agencies required new Hearing Rules. WAC 388-02s, under DSHS, had been the Hearing Rules for licensed childcare Providers. These new rules are now found under WAC 170-03. We are of the position that the Hearing Rules should mirror those already in place, (with perhaps additional rules added) and object to the omission of rules which protected Provider's due process rights.

The same objection applies to the Background Rules created (WAC 170-06). Additions and omission to these rules without input from the public were made. Most disturbing to us and the reason for this post, is the fact that these additions and deletions were made by the former agency, an agency known for its abuse of power over licensed childcare Providers and clearly reflect the old Administration's, under Rachael Langen's leadership, intent.

At the time of this writing we have not been able to ascertain whether the new Agency is aware of the deletions and additions to the rules now governing licensed childcare Providers or if they embrace these deletions and omissions.

We have listed the email addresses of the new Administrators. If you share our concerns or want clarification from the Department, please email Jone Bosworth, Peter Antolin, and Gary Burris, with your comments regarding these Rules or copy and paste our comments with a statement that you share these concerns. We currently have faith in the new Agency and are confident that they will respond to your emails.

For your reference the rules childcare Providers had been governed and regulated under and the new rules governing and regulating childcare Providers:
RCW 74.15 changed to RCW 43.15
WAC 388-02s changed to WAC 170-03s Hearing Rules
WAC 388-06s changed to WAC 170-06s Background Checks
Please note that not all applicable RCWs and WACs governing childcare Providers have been changed as a result of the new Agency i.e. Working Connections WACs 388-290 and Abuse and Neglect RCW 26.44s among others.

Here are some of the Rule changes we are taking exception to and identify as undermining if not eliminating childcare Providers' right to due process.

Concerns regarding a provision not included in the newly created RCW 43.215 which was provided for in RCW 74.15:

  • RCW 74.15.130 included (a) ...no unfounded report of child abuse or neglect may be used to deny employment or a license; RCW 43.215 omits that provision.

    Concerns regarding WAC 170-03 DEL Hearing Rules (replacing WAC 388-02):

  • WAC 170-03-0350 (1) ALJ have no discretionary authority and can not order an alternate remedy. It is our position that in order to preserve due process ALJs must have discretionary authority and the authority to order an alternate remedy.
  • Omitted from the 170-03s is a timeframe for submission of exhibits, which is prejudicial against the appellant if the appellant has made an Expedited STAY request.
  • Added is 170-03-0400 (4) which limits evidence in general
  • Added 170-03-0590 DEL Review Judges do not exist as of yet and are not expected to do reviews for another year. DSHS Board of Appeal Review Judges are still doing the appeals of initial decisions yet the address in this WAC indicates otherwise. The PO Box is not an active PO BOX for APPEALS. The other concern we have regarding DEL Review Judges is that the Judges will be employed by DEL just as the BOA Judges are currently employed by DSHS. We strongly oppose this conflict of interest and suggest that due process can not be provided under this system.

    Concerns regarding WAC 170-06, DEL Background Rules (replacing WAC 388-06):

  • Added to the background rules, 170-06-0050 is section (2) e, f, g. Subsection g is the most dangerous as it precludes a Provider from having unsupervised access to children pending the outcome of an Administrative Hearing a department imposed founded finding (a finding not yet heard before ALJ) and section (3) Allows the department to conduct character competence and suitability assessments of providers and their family members w/o probable cause. This WAC does not give any parameters or criteria for the assessment or the qualification of the licensor doing the assessment.
  • 170-06-0060 allows the department to request sexual deviancy, substance abuse, psychiatric, medical evaluations and provider must pay for them. No probable cause for these evaluations. Failure to comply with these requests can result in license revocation.

    The preceding is just a sampling of our concerns. Any one of these, even absent the others, is detrimental to Providers due process. The foundation for our concerns is strongly based on RCW 34.05 (The Administrative Procedures ACT). RCW 34.05 gives government agencies the authority to implement rules but those rules are to closely resemble 34.05. RCW 34.05 does not take the authority away from ALJs. The Department has done that; without input from the community.

    Other concerns:
    RCW 34.05.461(5) Where it bears on the issues presented, the agency's experience, technical competency, and specialized knowledge may be used in the evaluation of evidence.
    Licensors' testimony is viewed as credible evidence and is more often than not the only evidence offered in a Hearing. Licensor's testimony meets the preponderance of the evidence standard by this statute. (Preponderance of the evidence is the evidence standard in Administrative Hearings). It is our position that department testimony must be supported with factual evidence.

    We are also concerned about the added language to the Secretaries DSHS secretary's list of permanently disqualifying convictions. That list, as it relates to childcare Provides now reads "Department of Early Leaning Director's List of Crimes and Negative Actions". At the end of this paragraph is the link to that list. Scroll down near the bottom of the page to find out that a license restriction or licensee revocation holds the same disqualification as a murder or child molester. A license revocation (regardless of the reason, disqualifies you from becoming licensed or working in a licensed facility just as a murderer would be disqualified. http://www.del.wa.gov/pdf/ccel/del_directors_list_of_disqualifying_crimes.pdf

    If any of this causes concern for you or the families you provide care for contact the new administrators at the email address below. You have our full permission to copy and paste this posting. We encourage you to write your words as well. We encourage the families you provide care for to also send emails to the new Administration. We also encourage you to request that the Department provide a matrix of the changes in rules which occurred as a result of the new Agency. In order for transparent government to exist in this matter a true and accurate representation of the changes must be presented to Washington State Childcare Providers and other interested parties. (Again, you have full permission to copy this post and give it to your client/families to read and respond to.)

    We have limited our concerns to the above in an effort to reduce the size of this post. We are available to discuss these and other concerns. Please feel free to contact us.

    Some of you are aware that there is a Negotiated Rule Making committee being created addressing WAC 170-296s. The completion of the process and the committee members have yet to be decided but once in place we are hoping to be at the table with our recommendations. We will be posting some of those recommendations on the APRE WAC page. It is our intent to have that posting available to you by January 30, 2007. WAC 170-296s.
    The Department Of Early Learning new Administration email addresses:
    jone.bosworth@del.wa.gov
    peter.antolin@del.wa.gov
    Gary.Burris@del.wa.gov

    Please email us with your comments and concerns.
    Advocates@apreweb.com
    The Advocates.

  • Google

    www www.apreweb.com